# Wednesday, November 29, 2006

I took another look at the FileVersion sample. I wish the API was actually a little different. The API actually makes sense as a general use API, but it isn't as user-friendly as I would like. I wish that there were an instance method on the Assembly class called "GetFileVersion" or something like that it took nothing and returned a Version class.

Here is more of less what it would look like, except that the GetFileVersion wouldn't be static, it wouldn't take anything and would be on the assembly class.

If you look @ the FileVersion class, there is a lot of stuff on there, and it is a super wonky API anyway. I don't understand why it has a single static method that more or less acts that the instance constructor. Why not just have a constructor that takes a string or a FileInfo or even a FileStream. Bad API design. I prefer the Version class a lot more since it is super simple. I

using System;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Diagnostics;
namespace FileVersion
{
class Program
{
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Assembly asm;
Version ver;

asm = Assembly.Load("mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089");
ver = GetFileVersion(asm);
Console.WriteLine(ver.ToString());
}

static Version GetFileVersion(Assembly asm)
{
FileVersionInfo versionInfo;
Version ver;

versionInfo = FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo(asm.Location);
ver = new Version(versionInfo.FileMajorPart, versionInfo.FileMinorPart, versionInfo.FileBuildPart, versionInfo.FilePrivatePart);

return ver;
}
}
}

If you look @ the FileVersion class, there is a lot of stuff on there, and it is a super wonky API anyway. I don't understand why it has a single static method that more or less acts like an instance constructor. Why not just have a constructor that takes a string or a FileInfo or even a FileStream. Bad API design. I prefer the above method (for the assembly case) that returns the Version class since it is super simple. I realize that the native file version is a string, so can contain more stuff, but the 4-part version number is really all I want.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006 3:39:29 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 

The file version number is a native code concept – meaning not originating from the .NET Framework. This version number is a resource found within the resource section of the windows PE (portable executable) format of a managed or native code dll. This resource is named “FILEVERSION”. This version number is used for information purposes only, not for any runtime purposes such as binding. In addition, this version number does not have to conform to a particular format, but is only a string, although it does typically takes the form of a simple four-part number (i.e. 1.2.3.4).

Reading the File Version

The easiest way to view this number is to view the properties of a file in Windows Explorer. The version number listed is the file version number. The product version is also listed, although I don’t know how the two numbers differ exactly. Naturally, you can access the file version from code. The following code does just that, largely using the System.Diagnostics.FileVersionInfo class, which I’ve never used before. In fact, I had to ask someone else on the loader team for that information.

using System;

using System.Reflection;

using System.Diagnostics;

namespace FileVersion

{

    class Program

    {

        static void Main(string[] args)

        {

            Assembly asm = Assembly.Load("mscorlib, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,  PublicKeyToken=b77a5c561934e089");

            System.Diagnostics.FileVersionInfo fvi = FileVersionInfo.GetVersionInfo(asm.Location);

            Console.WriteLine(fvi.FileVersion);

        }

    }

}

 

Setting the File Version

The CLR provides an assembly-level custom attribute to set this version number for an assembly from managed code. This attribute is called System.Reflection.AssemblyFileVersion. You can see how to set it below.

using System;

using System.Reflection;

 

[assembly:System.Reflection.AssemblyFileVersion("2.3.4.5")]

 

namespace ConsoleApplication1

{

    class Program

    {

        static void Main(string[] args)

        {

            Console.WriteLine("I just set the file version!");

        }

    }

}

 

You can actually set this attribute in Visual Studio 2005 via the properties menu. In that case, you cannot set it in code, as I’ve done above, since you’ll then have two instances of the attribute. You only need to set the attribute directly, as I’ve done  above, if you are using the compiler directly, from the commandline.

Wednesday, November 29, 2006 12:00:36 AM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Tuesday, November 28, 2006

Versioning and version numbers are always a bit confusing. For the CLR and the .NET Framework, we’ve got lots of version numbers to think about. I’d like to debunk any confusion around them, explain what each version number means, how to view it and how to set it (if appropriate). Let’s take a look …

The version numbers that I’m going to discuss are:

·         Native file version

·         Managed assembly version

·         Metadata version

·         Metadata format version

·         .NET Framework versions

I’m going to discuss these version numbers (and anything else that comes up) across the next few posts.

Tuesday, November 28, 2006 11:53:35 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  | 
# Thursday, November 02, 2006

I made reference to the concept of textual identity in my last post, but didn’t go into a lot of detail. In this post, I’d like to describe the broader concept of assembly identity to provide folks with further insight as to what I was going on about. The following text is from a spec that I wrote; it should apply equally to v1.0, v1.1 and v2.0 and future .NET Framework versions.

Assembly Identity

The assembly identity is the name of an assembly. The filename, path, file hash or other characteristics are not part of the identity. The identity is used in two different ways: (1) to define the name of an assembly, and (2) to reference an assembly by name. These are sometimes referred to as “def” and “ref”. Both of these are assembly identity. In the case of a reference, the identity is used during binding to determine if and where an assembly is available.

 

Identity Composition

The assembly identity is composed of several distinct attributes that detail different characteristics about an assembly. Each attribute is used in binding if it is provided. The allowed attributes follow:

 

·         Simple name

o   Format: string

o   Description: The name is the simple name of the assembly. It is essentially the name without all the other attributes

o   Note: The name should always be the same as filename minus extension

·         Version

o   Format: Four 16-bit integers separated by “.”

o   Description: A four-part version number (Major.Minor.Build.Revision)

o   Note: Each one of the 16-bit integers overflow at 165536 and underflow at -1

·         PublicKeyToken or PublicKey

o   Format: An 8-byte or variable length (48- to 2048-byte) string, respectively or “neutral” or “null”

o   Description: The public key token or key specifies the cryptographic signature of an assembly, guaranteeing that the assembly is from a particular publisher or set of assemblies (with that same token or key)

o   Note: The token is almost always provided instead of the much longer key

·         Culture

o   Format: string or “neutral” or “null”

o   Description: An arbitrary string that represents a culture installed on the system

·         ProcessorArchitecture

o   Format:  “MSIL” or “X86” or “X64” or “IA64”

o   Description: The processor architecture (PA) attribute specifies the requirement of a particular platform to execute a particular assembly. “MSIL” is an agnostic PA, as “MSIL” assemblies are allowed to be executed on any processor. All other PA options are “bit-specific” and must be run on a specific platform.

o   Note: PA doesn’t relate directly to processor or CPU. For example, X86 assemblies can be execute on X64 machines using the WoW64 infrastructure.

·         Retargetable

o   Format: “yes” or “no”

o   Description: The retargetable attribute specifies that an assembly can be retargeted to another assembly, meaning a reference to another assembly can be retargeted to this one.

o   Note: The retargeting mechanism is more complicated than described here, and is not at all a common scenario

 

Note: In all cases, the attributes and enumeration values are matched during binding case insensitively.

 

Textual Identity

The assembly identity can be specified in a string format, most often referred to as a “textual identity”. This form of the assembly identity is used by many APIs within the .NET Framework. There are also APIs that parse the textual identity string and return the identity back as a class, removing the need for developers to parse or create a textual identity string. More on that class later.

 

Textual Identity Specification

The specification of this format follows:

 

simple_name (“,” attribute “=” value)+

 

The textual identity starts with the simple name, and then a set of attributes and their values. Each attribute starts with a “,” and then its name, followed by a “=” and then a quoted or non-quoted value for that attribute. Whitespace can occur pretty much anywhere within the string, except within the attribute names, which are essentially tokens.

 

The allowed attributes, mapping directly to the components described in the previous section, are listed below:

  • Simple name à has no attribute name, requiring only its value
  • Version à “Version”
  • Culture à “Culture”
  • Public key or token à “PublicKey” or “PublicKeyToken”
  • Processor architecture à “ProcessorArchitecture”
  • Retargetable à “Retargetable”

 

 

The following characters can be escaped as part of the identity, with the escape character “\”:

  • t
  • r
  • n
  • \
  • =
  • U(HexChar)

Textual Identity Error Cases

The textual identity parser will error in the following cases:

 

  • The textual identity doesn’t match the correct general format (“,” attribute “=” value)+
  • The textual identity includes attributes that are unknown (i.e. foo=bar)
  • There is a value that doesn’t match a member of a given enumeration (i.e. “powerpc”)
  • A part of any version number under- or over-flows the integer

AssemblyName Class

The .NET Framework includes a class called System.Reflection.AssemblyName. An AssemblyName takes the textual identity in its constructor, parses the string and then provides access to each attribute of the identity via handy properties. The constructor throws if the provided string is invalid according to the specification provided above.

 

The term “assembly name” is sometimes used interchangeably with “assembly identity”. It is generally best to think of “assembly name” as the AssemblyName class, and “assembly identity” as the boarder concept of the multi-part name of an assembly as described earlier.

 

Strong versus Partial versus Weak Names

Up until this point, the assembly identity has been described as if all the parts always have to be there. That is not the case. There are essentially three categories of names, depending on how much of the identity attributes are specified.

 

Strong name

·         Simple name

·         Version

·         Culture

·         PublicKey or PublicKeyToken

 

Weak name

·         Simple name

 

Partial name

·         A weak name, or

·         Additional attributes beyond a weak name, but not enough to be considered a strong name

 

There are two other attributes: ProcessorArchitecture and Retargetable. ProcessorArchitecture is always optional, and just really makes a strong name more stronger. Retargetable is not commonly used.

Thursday, November 02, 2006 11:12:05 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #    Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]  |